The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Mohammed Anaikar
High Court
10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Mohammed Anaikar
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Mohammed Anaikar, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are left https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal No.101 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
...Appellant
VsShri Mohammed Anaikar...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 17.7.2015 in ITA No.35/Mds/2015 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2010-11 against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax(A)-V, Chennai dated 23.9.2014 in ITANo.1038/13-14 and against the order dated 20.6.2013 in ITANo.1038/13-14(A)-V on the fiel of the Income Tax Officer,Business Ward XV(4), Chennai-34.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are left
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
open. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heardand decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-V, Chennai.
3. The Income Tax Officer,Business Ward XV(4), Chennai-34.
4. The Additional Joint Commissioner, of Inocme Tax, Business Range XV, Chennai-34.
+1cc to M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan, Advocate SR.No.70762
+1cc to Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Advocate SR.No.70649
TCA.No.101 of 2016
GMY(19/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.