The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Varadarajan Santhanaraman
High Court
12 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Varadarajan Santhanaraman
Date of order
12 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Shri Varadarajan Santhanaraman, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai....AppellantVsShri Varadarajan Santhanaraman...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 25.1.2017 in ITA No.2309/Mds/2016on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai'A' Bench for the assessment year 2012-13 and against theorder dt. 30.03.2016 in ITA NO.204/CIT(A)-2/2014-2015 onthe file of the commissioner of Income Tax (appeals)-2,121,M.G.Road,Nungambakkam Chennai and against the orderdt 29.11.2014 in PAN NO. for the Assessment year2012-2013 on the file of the Deputy commissioner of IncomeTax,Non Corporate circle -2, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.T.RavikumarFor Respondent : No appearance
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law raisedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits.
//True Copy//
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(co)
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench.
+1cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar , Advocate SR.No. 70944+1cc to Mr.G.Baskar, Advocate SR.No. 70982TCA.No.468 of 2017ASK(19/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.