The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Tamil Nadu Tennis Association,Nungambakkam Tennis Stadium,Chennai-34
High Court
08 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Tamil Nadu Tennis Association,Nungambakkam Tennis Stadium,Chennai-34
Date of order
08 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Tamil Nadu Tennis Association,Nungambakkam Tennis Stadium,Chennai-34, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal Nos.477 and 480 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
...Appellant
Vs
Tamil Nadu Tennis Association,Nungambakkam Tennis Stadium,Chennai-34....Respondent
APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the common order dated 28.11.2014 in ITANo.1757/Mds/2013 and C.O.No.169/ Mds/2013 on the file of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Bench respectively forthe assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik RanganathanFor Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
COMMON JUDGMENT(Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided theissue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event, in each of the cases, the tax effect isabove the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench.2. The commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.+1cc to Mr.Sridhar, Advocate, S.R.No. 69279TCA.Nos.477 & 480 of 2015MG(CO)GN(27/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.