The Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Iii, Chennai v. M/S.chandiya Chemicals
High Court
10 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Iii, Chennai v. M/S.chandiya Chemicals
Date of order
10 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Iii, Chennai v. M/S.chandiya Chemicals, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in an appropriatecase. ssk.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
The Commissioner of Income TaxCircle III, Chennai. ...AppellantVs.
M/s.Chandiya Chemicals,4/349, Old Mahabalipuram Road,Oggiyam Thuraipakkam, Chennai-96. ...Respondent
PRAYER: - Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.11.2008made in ITA No.275/Mds/2008, preferred against the Commissionerof Income Tax (Appeals) VIII, Chennai dated 27.11.07 made inITA.026/2006-07, against the order of the Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax , Business Circle III, Chennai-34, dated27.02.2006 made in PAN: for the Assessment Year 2003-04.
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar Senior Standing Counsel
For respondent : No appearance
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.11.2008made in ITA No.275/Mds/2008, by raising the followingsubstantial question of law:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"When a partner in the assessee firm is also apartner in the sister concern which receivecommission year after year, attracts section 40A(2),(b) of the Income Tax Act or not?"
2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appealsshall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
ssk.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) VIII, Circle III, Chennai.
2. M/s.Chandiya Chemicals, 4/349, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Oggiyam Thuraipakkam, Chennai-96.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle III (3), Chennai 34.
4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.
ssv(CO)kak(22/03/2019)
TCA No.996 of 2009
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.