Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle V...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle V, Chennai v. Shri.vijayakumar Gaubar

High Court 19 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle V, Chennai v. Shri.vijayakumar Gaubar
Date of order
19 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004, 2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle V, Chennai v. Shri.vijayakumar Gaubar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the said submissions, the above taxcase appeal is dismissed on account of the low tax effect.The substantial question of law framed is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.8.2019 The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal No.982 of 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle V, Chennai ...Appellant VsShri.Vijayakumar Gaubar...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961againsttheorderdated09.4.2010madeinITA.No.1405/Mds/2009 on the file of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench for the assessmentyear 2003-04 and against the order of the Commissioner ofIncome tax (Appeals)-VIII, chennai dated 25.06.2019 made inITA.No 71/08-09 for the Assessment year 2003-2004. and Against the order of the Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax Business Range V, chennai 34 dated 24.12.2008r/w sec 143(3) r/w sec 263. For Appellant: Mrs.R.Hemalatha, SSCRespondent : served and no appearance Judgment was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J We have heard Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior StandingCounsel appearing for the appellant – Revenue. 2. This appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260Aof the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the orderdated 09.4.2010 made in ITA.No. 1405/Mds/2009 on the fileof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2003-04. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellantsubmits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenueon account of the low tax effect in terms of CircularNo.17/2019 dated 08.8.2019 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit forfiling or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has beenincreased to Rs.1 Crore. It is further submitted that thetax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit. 5. In the light of the said submissions, the above taxcase appeal is dismissed on account of the low tax effect.The substantial question of law framed is left open. In theevent the tax effect is above the threshold limit fixed inthe said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to beheard and decided on merits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan