The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 10, Mumbai v. M/S.fiat Sundaram Auto Finance Limited, Mumbai
High Court
22 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 10, Mumbai v. M/S.fiat Sundaram Auto Finance Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
22 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 10, Mumbai v. M/S.fiat Sundaram Auto Finance Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2165 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5542 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City 10, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Fiat Sundaram Auto Finance Limited, Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 22[nd] March, 2011.
1.Heard. None for the respondent, though served. Affidavit of service filed by the Counsel for the appellant is taken on record.
2.For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue