The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-10 v. M/S.godrej Soaps Limited
High Court
16 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-10 v. M/S.godrej Soaps Limited
Date of order
16 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-10 v. M/S.godrej Soaps Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.313 OF 2008
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1300 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City-10
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Godrej Soaps Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 16th JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.On the motion made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn since the question sought to be raised in this appeal does not arise from the order of the tribunal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
2.In view of dismissal of the appeal, it is not necessary to condone the delay. The notice of motion is therefore dismissed.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue