Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 1...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 13, Mumbai v. M/S.ganpatrai Jaigopal

High Court 11 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 13, Mumbai v. M/S.ganpatrai Jaigopal
Date of order
11 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City - 13, Mumbai v. M/S.ganpatrai Jaigopal, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 276 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax,City - 13, Mumbai vs. M/s.Ganpatrai Jaigopal Appellant Respondent Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mr.V.H. Kantharia i/b.Mr.L.S.Shetty for the appellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 11th October 2004 P.C. Heard. of Ship Scrap Traders & ors v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 251 ITR 806. 3. No substantial question of law arises. 4. Dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan