Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 16,...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 16, Mumbai v. Mahendra Brothers, Mumbai

High Court 02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 16, Mumbai v. Mahendra Brothers, Mumbai
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City 16, Mumbai v. Mahendra Brothers, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2552 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City 16, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Mahendra Brothers, Mumbai ..Respondent. None for the appellant.Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009 P.C. :1.None for the revenue. 2.Dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan