The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City 26, Mumbai v. Rodrick Sale
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City 26, Mumbai v. Rodrick Sale
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City 26, Mumbai v. Rodrick Sale, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1347 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax, City 26, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Rodrick Sale
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Since the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs and in view of the office Memorandum dated 5-6-2007 issued by the C.B.D.T. and
judgments of this Court in CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. (2002) 254 I.T.R. 565
and CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works (2005) 276 ITR 519, learned counsel for the revenue seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
2.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue