In The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 5 v. M/S. Ravi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.500 OF 2008
INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.758 OF 2005ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.377 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax City 5.v.M/s. Ravi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mrs. S.V.Bharucha for the Appellant.Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2013
PC:
Counsel for the revenue states that she has instructions to
withdraw the present notice of motion.
2In view of the above, notice of motion is allowed to be withdrawn.
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.