In The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 7 v. M/S. Siyaram Investments Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view thereof appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.796 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax City 7: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Siyaram Investments Ltd.
: Respondent
Mr. J.S. Saluja for AppellantMr. Sanjiv M. Shah for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 24.9.2008
P.C..Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent.
.
The learned counsel for the appellant is not
pressing question no.3 in the above appeal as the same
has been remanded back to the assessing officer incase of Maruti Udyog ltd. vs DCIT, 92 ITD 119.
.As far as question no. 1 and 2 are concerned
it is squarely covered by the judgment of the High
Court in case of The Commissioner of Income Tax vsM/s. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. in
Income Tax Appeal no. 18 of 2006 dt. 8.8.2008. It
is answered against revenue and in favour of the
assessee. In view thereof appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.