Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City – 8...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City – 8, Mumbai v. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Limited

High Court 22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Jun 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City – 8, Mumbai v. Usha Garments Manufacturing Co. Limited, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION N. MOTION NO.1808 OF 2009 IN I.T. APPEAL (L) NO.2970 OF 2007ANDN. MOTION NO.1809 OF 2009 IN I.T.APPEAL (L) NO.2971 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City – 8, Mumbai ..Appellant.VersusUsha Garments Manufacturing Co. Limited..Respondent. ..Respondent. N.MOTION NO.1842 OF 2009 IN I.T. APPEAL (L) NO.2782 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City – 8, Mumbai ..AppellantVersusS.M. Dyechem Limited ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.In spite of service, nobody is appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. Subject to filing affidavit of service, delay caused in filing these appeals is condoned. All the notices of motion are made absolute. 3.Copies of acknowledgment filed is retained on record. 4.Time to remove office objections is extended by one week from today. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.