Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.santoor Commercials Ltd

High Court 15 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.santoor Commercials Ltd
Date of order
15 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.santoor Commercials Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2003 The Commissioner of IncomeTax, City-III, Mumbai vs. M/s.Santoor Commercials Ltd. Appellant Respondent Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.R.Asokan i/b. Mr.K.B. Rao for therespondent. CORAM: R. M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 15th September 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. No substantial question of law arises. 3. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan