Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Ix...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Ix v. M/S.fancier Investments (P) Ltd

High Court 12 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Ix v. M/S.fancier Investments (P) Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Ix v. M/S.fancier Investments (P) Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.2 OF 2004 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.2 OF 2004 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.15 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.15 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City IX .. Appellant V/s M/s.Fancier Investments (P) Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. ATE : 12th June, 2007. DATE : 12th June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the Rules. 2. In view of disposal of the Appeal, nothing further survives in the aforesaid Notice of Motion 15/2004. Hence, Notice of Motion 15/2004 also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan