Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Vi,...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.laxmi Ventures (India) Limited

High Court 26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.laxmi Ventures (India) Limited
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.laxmi Ventures (India) Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections, the appeal shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2003 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2427 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City VI, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Laxmi Ventures (India) Limited ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.Mr.Deepak Tarlsawala with Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavits, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order are to costs. 2.Appellant is directed to remove office objections and get the appeal numbered. Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections, the appeal shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan