Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Vi v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Vi v. M/S., Glaxosmith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Vi v. M/S., Glaxosmith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax City Vi v. M/S., Glaxosmith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1041 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income tax City VI.Vs. M/s., Glaxosmith Kline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. P.J.Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashish Rao and Mr. Tejas Shah i/by M & M Legal for the Respondent. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. O5 MARCH 2012 PC: This appeal for Assessment year 1990-91 arises from a decision rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31 January 2007. The accompanying Appeal No.1123 of 2009 for Assessment Year 1989-90 which raised the same question of law has been dismissed by a separate order passed today. Both the Counsel for the Revenue and the Assessee state that this appeal would be governed by the same decision of this Court. For the reasons already indicated by the Court while dismissing the companion appeal, in this appeal also no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ( DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J ) ( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan