Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City Vii,...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.voltas Limited

High Court 24 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.voltas Limited
Date of order
24 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax City Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.voltas Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3133 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income-tax City VII, Mumbai......Appellant.VersusM/s.Voltas Limited................Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Rajesh Poojary i/by Mulla & Mulla for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ. DATE : 24[th] June, 2011. P.C. : 1.Counsel for the parties state that similar appeals filed by the Revenue in the assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1752 of 2009 have been dismissed by this Court on the basis of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/s.Rotork Controls India (P) Limited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai reported in 314 ITR 62. 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan