In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Vii v. M/S.piramal Enterprises Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals, are therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1716 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1717 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City VII
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Piramal Enterprises Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Atul K Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 14TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard Learned Counsel for the revenue.
2.He fairly states that the order of earlier assessment year relied upon by the tribunal in the impugned order has been accepted by the revenue.
3.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises in these appeals. The appeals, are therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue