In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Xiii, Mumbai v. Shri M. L. Sutaria, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. .Appellant would be entitled to refund ofcourt fee as per Rules. .With the withdrawal of the appeal, Notice of Motion would not survive.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO. 985 OF 2002.WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3290 OF 2002.
The Commissioner of Income-tax,City-XIII, Mumbai.vs.Shri M. L. Sutaria
..Appellant.
.. Respondent.
Shri Parag Vyas i/b G.C. Mishra for the Appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 20.9. 2005.
P.C. :----.On the motion made by the learned Counselappearing for the appellant, he is allowed
withdraw this appeal. Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn with no order as to costs.
.Appellant would be entitled to refund ofcourt fee as per Rules.
.With the withdrawal of the appeal, Notice of
Motion would not survive.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)(V.CDAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue