The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Coimbatore v. M/S.karthi Kirshna Exports, Tirupur
High Court
02 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Coimbatore v. M/S.karthi Kirshna Exports, Tirupur
Date of order
02 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Coimbatore v. M/S.karthi Kirshna Exports, Tirupur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.1.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
TAX CASE APPEAL NO.691 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore...Appellant/Appellant
Vs
M/s.Karthi Kirshna Exports, Tirupur...Respondent/Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 03.9.2014 in ITA No.1521/Mds/2014 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2006-07.
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, SSC
ORDERJudgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JHeard the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. The appeal was admitted on 25.8.2015 onthe following substantial questions of law :
“i. Whether, while computing reliefunder Section 10B, expenditure incurred bythe assessee has to be excluded from itstotal turnover also, if the same is reducedfrom export turnover ? And
ii. Whether the definition of totalturnover, as defined in Section 80HHC, whichwas subsequently inserted vide amendment,can be imported for the purpose of applyingthe formula prescribed by Sub-Section (4) of
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Section 10B, when the Legislature hasintentionally omitted the definition of theterm 'for the purpose of Section 10B' ?”
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make amention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits.
rsTo
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II, Coimbatore.3.The Income Tax Officer,Ward 1(4), Tirupur.
+1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.211+1cc to Mr.R.Hemalatha, Advocate, S.R.No.284
TCA.No.691 of 2015
SSD(CO)CS/19/02/2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.