Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29

High Court 22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.10.2018 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN TAX CASE APPEAL NO.792 OF 2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai ...Appellant/RespondentVs Wardex Pharmaceuticals PrivateLimited, Chennai-29 ...Respondent/ Appellant APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 05.6.2017 in ITA No.1154/Mds/2016 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Bench forthe assessment year 2011-12. against the order of theCommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals)II,Chennai,dated:24/02/2016, made in ITA.No.233/2014-15-CIT(A)-11, andagainst the order of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai, dated:26/03/2014 made inPAN.No.AAACW1036D. For Appellant : Ms.S.Premalatha For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan forM/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JHeard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heardand decided on merits. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chennai 'C' Bench.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,(Appeals)-II, Chennai3.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai.4.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai.+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.71670+1cc to Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar, Advocate, S.R.No.71639TCA.No.792 of 2017BR(CO)GSP(22/11/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan