The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29
High Court
22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai v. Wardex Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, Chennai-29, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.10.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
TAX CASE APPEAL NO.792 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Range 3, Chennai
...Appellant/RespondentVs
Wardex Pharmaceuticals PrivateLimited, Chennai-29
...Respondent/ Appellant
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 05.6.2017 in ITA No.1154/Mds/2016 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Bench forthe assessment year 2011-12. against the order of theCommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals)II,Chennai,dated:24/02/2016, made in ITA.No.233/2014-15-CIT(A)-11, andagainst the order of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai, dated:26/03/2014 made inPAN.No.AAACW1036D.
For Appellant : Ms.S.Premalatha
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan forM/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JHeard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heardand decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chennai 'C' Bench.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,(Appeals)-II, Chennai3.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai.4.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-III, Chennai.+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.71670+1cc to Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar, Advocate, S.R.No.71639TCA.No.792 of 2017BR(CO)GSP(22/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.