The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh v. M/S Improvement Trust, Moga
High Court
23 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh v. M/S Improvement Trust, Moga
Date of order
23 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh v. M/S Improvement Trust, Moga, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
�������������������������������������
DATE OF DECISION: 23.12.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh.
versus
…..Appellant
M/s Improvement Trust, Moga
.....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL, JUDGE.
Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant Mrs. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinku Dahiya, Advocate, for the respondent ..
S.J.VAZIFDAR,CHIEFJUSTICE:
For orders, see order of even date passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 62 of 2015 titled as The Tribune Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh and another.
(S.J.VAZIFDAR)
CHIEF JUSTICE
23.12.2016 Ravinder/Parkash
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking√ Whether reportable: Yes√
Yes√
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue