The Commissioner Of Income –Tax Exemption v. Bharat Bhushan Jain Charitable Trust
High Court
02 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income –Tax Exemption v. Bharat Bhushan Jain Charitable Trust
Date of order
02 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income –Tax Exemption v. Bharat Bhushan Jain Charitable Trust, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~43
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 716/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME –TAX EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
BHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN CHARITABLE TRUST
..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R% 02.08.2019
1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 12[th] February 2019 passed by the ITAT in ITA 750/Del/2018.
2. The question urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was justified in allowing the Assessee‟s appeal and in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [„CIT(E)‟] to grant the Assessee exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟).
3. The case of the Revenue is that the Assessee had not commenced any activity as set forth in the Trust Deed and had only given a donation to another educational institution and this could not be considered to be a
charitable activity undertaken by it. The Court finds that the ITAT has placed reliance on the decision dated 6[th] February 2019 of a co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT in Bharat Vikash Parishad Maharana Pratap Nyas v. CIT(E) (ITA No.6487/Del/2018) where in similar circumstances the exemption under Section 80G(5) of the Act was allowed by the ITAT after taking note of the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CIT(E) v. Sant Girdhar Anand Paramhans Sant Ashram (2018) 408 ITR 79 (P&H).
4. Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue, the Court is of the view that the view formed by the ITAT in the impugned order was a plausible one to take and in the facts and circumstances of the case. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
AUGUST 02, 2019 / tr
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.