Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exempti...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliance Through: None

High Court 23 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliance Through: None
Date of order
23 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliance Through: None, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 651/2019 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTION ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus INDIA HIV/AIDS ALLIANCE Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R % 23.07.2019 1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order dated 23[rd]January, 2019 in ITA No. 716/Del/2017 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. 2. The short point that is sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was right in holding that the activity of the Assessee did not cease to be a „charitable activity‟ for the purposes of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) because the Assessee charged a „management fee‟ for defraying its administrative expenses. 3. In the impugned order the ITAT has noticed that the Assessee is a company registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act. It gives 85% of the donation received by it to the Government of India for HIV Aids and only 15% of its total donation is given to other societies for awareness and treatment of poor HIV Patients. The entire amount spent by the Assessee is through societies and trusts. It also runs its own project for the welfare of HIV and AIDS patients. In the above circumstances it has been held that merely because the Assessee charges management fees to defray the administrative costs it would not make its essential activity a business activity. 4. The Court is unable to find any legal infirmity in the impugned order of the ITAT. No substantial question of law arises. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. JULY 23, 2019 mr TALWANT SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan