In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliance Through: None, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 651/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue.
versus
INDIA HIV/AIDS ALLIANCE Through: None.
..... Respondent
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R
%
23.07.2019
1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order dated 23[rd]January, 2019 in ITA No. 716/Del/2017 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11.
2. The short point that is sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was right in holding that the activity of the Assessee did not cease to be a „charitable activity‟ for the purposes of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) because the Assessee charged a „management fee‟ for defraying its administrative expenses.
3. In the impugned order the ITAT has noticed that the Assessee is a company registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act. It gives 85% of
the donation received by it to the Government of India for HIV Aids and only 15% of its total donation is given to other societies for awareness and treatment of poor HIV Patients. The entire amount spent by the Assessee is through societies and trusts. It also runs its own project for the welfare of HIV and AIDS patients. In the above circumstances it has been held that merely because the Assessee charges management fees to defray the administrative costs it would not make its essential activity a business activity.
4. The Court is unable to find any legal infirmity in the impugned order of the ITAT. No substantial question of law arises.
5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
JULY 23, 2019 mr
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.