The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliancethrough:none
High Court
24 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliancethrough:none
Date of order
24 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. India Hiv/Aids Alliancethrough:none, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~2
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 1020/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through:Mr.Shlok Chandra and Ms.MadhuraM.N, Advocates
versus
INDIA HIV/AIDS ALLIANCEThrough:None
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%24.12.2019
-C.M. No. 55192/2019 (delay in refiling)
1. By this application the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 138 daysin re-filing the application.For the reasons stated in the application, thedelay is condoned.
2. The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
ITA 1020/2019
3. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 23[rd]January, 2019passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench “C”, New Delhiin ITA No. 7210/Del/2017, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent-assessee was allowed by the Tribunal and the Tribunal held that therespondent was covered by Section 2(15), and not to proviso thereof, of theIncome Tax Act.
4. The findings returned by the Tribunal are completely factual. By theimpugned order the Tribunal had also decided ITA No. 716/Del/2017, whichrelated to the assessment year 2010-11. The appeal preferred by the revenuein ITA 651/2019 from the same common order has been rejected by thisCourt on 23[rd]July, 2019, while observing that no substantial questions oflaw arises for consideration.
5. No substantial question of law arises in present appeal. Accordingly, theappeal is disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 24, 2019
v
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.