In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Exemption v. Indian Olympic Association, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Issue: The issue before the Tribunal was whether the Respondent assessee was not entitled to be treated as a charitable institution under Section 2 (15), by virtue of the proviso to the said section.
Decision: Following the decision in ITA 110/2019, we dismiss this appeal since no substantial question of law arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~56
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 963/2019 & CM APPL. 50939-50940/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION
..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R
%
26.11.2019
1. The Revenue has preferred the present appeal to assail the order dated 19.07.2018 passed by the ITAT Delhi, “B” Bench in ITA 1130/Del/2016 relating to assessment year 2011-12. The issue before the Tribunal was whether the Respondent assessee was not entitled to be treated as a charitable institution under Section 2 (15), by virtue of the proviso to the said section. The Tribunal has held in favour of the Respondent assessee. The issue raised in the present appeal was raised in the case of the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10 in ITA 110/2019, and this Court vide order dated 04.02.2019 held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration.
2. Following the decision in ITA 110/2019, we dismiss this appeal since no
substantial question of law arises.
NOVEMBER 26, 2019 nk
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.