The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Indian Youth Centre Trust
High Court
04 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Indian Youth Centre Trust
Date of order
04 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Indian Youth Centre Trust, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~58
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 118/2019 & CM Appl. 5255/2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
INDIAN YOUTH CENTRE TRUST
Through: Presence not given.
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANO R D E R% 04.02.2019
In this appeal, the Revenue urges that the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is incorrect.
The assessee in this appeal claims to be engaged in the maintaining of National or International Youth Centres. For the relevant years, the assessee reported receipt of some amounts towards fees for conducting various activities.
The Assessing Officer (AO) felt that since the assessee was engaged in providing commercial activity, the proviso to Section –2(15) was attracted. The ITAT ruled on the basis of this Court’s decision in the assessee’s own case for other assessment years (ITA No.868 of 2016, decided on 14.12.2016), wherein the judgments in
India Trade Promotion Organization v. DGIT, 2015 (374) ITR 333 and Institution of Chartered Accounts v. DGIT, (E), 2013 (358) ITR 91 (Del) were referred to, that the mere circumstance of collection of such amounts did not result in the assessee losing its essential character of being established for charitable purposes.
We are of the opinion that the ITAT’s decision is sound in law and facts. No substantial question of law arises. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2019 pkb
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.