The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation
High Court
25 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation
Date of order
25 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~110
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 492/2018
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION
Through:
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R% 25.04.2018
In this appeal the Revenue questions an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal („ITAT‟). Both, the ITAT and the Appellate Commissioner had differed and set aside the Assessing Officer‟s determination to deny charitable status. The AO had held that the assessee did not file its return in time, and had instead filed it under Section 139(4) of the Income Tax, 1961. The AO‟s decision was based upon a literal interpretation of the second explanation to Section 11(2) of the Act. The lower appellate authorities in this case relied upon the judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as „Trustees of Tulsidas Gopalji Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax‟, 207 ITR 368. This Court is of the opinion that the reliance upon the judgment in the case of „Trustees of Tulsidas Gopalji Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust‟(supra)
was reasonable and the restoration of the charitable status to the assessee, warranted.
No question of law therefore arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
APRIL 25, 2018 nn
VINOD GOEL, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.