The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru v. Goa Cricket Asociation, Goa Cricket Academy
High Court
02 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru v. Goa Cricket Asociation, Goa Cricket Academy
Date of order
02 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru v. Goa Cricket Asociation, Goa Cricket Academy, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The impugned order does not decide the controversyconcerning whether or not the Assessee has a case forCorrection carried out as registration under Section 12A.
Decision: The Tax Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2019
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BENGALURU. ... AppellantVersusGOA CRICKET ASOCIATION, GOACRICKET ACADEMY ... Respondent
Mr. Raviraj and Ms Amira Abdul Razaq, Advocates for theappellant.
Mr. S.S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Kamat, Advocatefor the respondent.
Coram:-S. C. GUPTE &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.Date:- 2nd July 2019
P.C.:
This Tax Appeal challenges an order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Panaji in anappeal arising out of an application moved by the Assessee-Association for registration under Section 12A of the IncomeTax Act. The impugned order does not decide the controversyconcerning whether or not the Assessee has a case forCorrection carried out as registration under Section 12A. What the ITAT has done is toper order dated (Exemptions)21/10/2019set aside the order of CIT (Appeals)and remand the matter to Sd/-him for a fresh decision in accordance with law, directing it toconsider the matter in the light of various judgments referred
2
by the ITAT in the impugned order. Since the controversy is not
concluded and the matter is open to be debated beforeCorrection carried out as (Exemptions)per order dated CIT(Appeals), no substantial question of law arises in the21/10/2019 Sd/-matter and none calls for a decision of this Court.
2. The Tax Appeal is accordingly dismissed. All rights andcontentions of the revenue as well as the Assessee are keptopen.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
S. C. GUPTE, J.
mv
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.