The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. Baba Hira Singh Bhattal Institute Of Engineering & Technology
High Court
17 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. Baba Hira Singh Bhattal Institute Of Engineering & Technology
Date of order
17 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. Baba Hira Singh Bhattal Institute Of Engineering & Technology, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.257 of 2018 (O&M),Date of Decision: 17.19.2019
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh...... Appellant
Vs.
Baba Hira Singh Bhattal Institute of Engineering & Technology
...... Respondent
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant.
+++++
AJAY TEWARI_ J. (QRAL)
1,Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, furtheramended vide Circular No.1/7 ot 2JO19 dated 08.08.2019 read with LetterNo. F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he has instructions towithdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to theappellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal, in casesomething survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3.Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending application, ifany, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE|
October 17, 2019Meenu
Whether speaking /reasoned* Yes/NoWhether Reportable* Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.