Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptio...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Ameliorating India

High Court 14 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

14 Feb 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Ameliorating India, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No. 346 of 2016 Date of decision: 14.2.2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh ……Appellant Vs. M/s Ameliorating India …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr.Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Naresh Ghai, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. For orders, see ITA No. 320 of 2016 (The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh Vs. M/s Ameliorating India). (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge February 14, 2017 ‘gs’ (Ramendra Jain) Judge IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 346 of 2016 Date of decision: 14.2.2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh ……Appellant Vs. M/s Ameliorating India …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr.Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Naresh Ghai, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. For orders, see ITA No. 320 of 2016 (The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh Vs. M/s Ameliorating India). (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge February 14, 2017 ‘gs’ (Ramendra Jain) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.