The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Jan Shakti Charitable Trust, Rohtak
High Court
30 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Jan Shakti Charitable Trust, Rohtak
Date of order
30 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Jan Shakti Charitable Trust, Rohtak, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral): **** [1]This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NewDelhi in ITA No.5713/Del/2013, dated 23.11.2015. [2]After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the partiesare agreed that order of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
���IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
****
ITA No.167 of 2016 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 30.01.2020
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh
Versus
Appellant
M/s Jan Shakti Charitable Trust, Rohtak
Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counsel
for the appellant-Revenue.
Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocatefor the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral):
****
[1]This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NewDelhi in ITA No.5713/Del/2013, dated 23.11.2015.
[2]After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the partiesare agreed that order of the Tribunal be set aside and matter be remandedback to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak to decide the matterafresh after hearing the parties.
[3]Disposed of accordingly.
[4]Since the appeal is disposed of, the pending application(s), if
any, also stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
January 30, 2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue