The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Cooperative Bank Employees Pension Fund Trust
High Court
09 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Cooperative Bank Employees Pension Fund Trust
Date of order
09 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Cooperative Bank Employees Pension Fund Trust, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No. 225 of 2019 Date of Decision: 09.9.2019
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh
.......Appellant
Vs.
M/s Punjab Cooperative Bank Employees Pension Fund Trust
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Tajender Joshi, Advocate for Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant.
*****
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with Letter No. F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE
September 09, 2019GurpreetWhether speaking /reasoned : YesWhether Reportable : No
GURPREET SINGH2019.09.10 17:07I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this documentchandigarh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.