Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptio...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Tibetan Children, Village Dharamshala Cantt., Distt. Kangra

High Court 04 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Tibetan Children, Village Dharamshala Cantt., Distt. Kangra
Date of order
04 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Tibetan Children, Village Dharamshala Cantt., Distt. Kangra, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --ITA1882016 (O&M)-Date of decision: 04.10.2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh Versus ...Appellant M/s Tibetan Children, Village Dharamshala Cantt., Distt. Kangra. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present:- Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. * * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL) In view of the order and judgement of a Division Bench of this Court dated 03.03.2016 in ITA-327-2015 titled as The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh Vs The Tibetan Children’s Village, Dal Lake, Dharamshala Cantt. (HP), the complete paper books of the appeal are returned to the appellant-revenue for filing before the competent Court of jurisdiction in accordance with law. 2. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE 04.10.2016 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan