The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chandigarh v. Nand Singh Memorial Society
High Court
12 Feb 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chandigarh v. Nand Singh Memorial Society
Date of order
12 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chandigarh v. Nand Singh Memorial Society, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Appeal stands dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
2024:PHHC:019244-DB
ITA-140-2022
Date of Decision: 12.02.2024
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Chandigarh
. . . . Appellant
Vs.
Nand Singh Memorial Society
. . . . Respondent
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
****
Present Mr. Amanpreet (A.P.), Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant.
****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
1.This is an appeal preferred against the order dated 24.09.2021 passed in
ITA Nos.61 & 117/ASR/2020, whereby the following order was passed:
“11. In the light of the above we set aside the order passed by the Commissioner and remand the matter to CIT(E). The CIT(E) is directed to pass fresh speaking order, in terms of direction given hereinabove, after following the principle of natural justice and affording the opportunity of hearing to the assessee.”
2.Keeping in view that all the issues have been kept open, this Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere with the order impugned. not deem it appropriate to interfere with the order impugned.
3.Appeal stands dismissed accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
February 12, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?
2. Whether reportable?
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.