Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptio...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Padma Education And Welfare Society

High Court 12 Oct 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Padma Education And Welfare Society
Date of order
12 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Padma Education And Welfare Society, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C/CA/2065/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2065 of 2020 In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 327 of 2020 ==========================================================THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) Versus PADMA EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY ========================================================== Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATHandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Date : 12/10/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the partiesand having gone through the averments made in the civilapplication, we are convinced with the sufficient cause made outby the applicant for condonation of delay of 217 days in filing theappeal The delay is, accordingly, condoned. The civilapplication stands allowed and disposed of accordingly. TheRegistry shall now give a regular number to the letters patentappeal. (VIKRAM NATH, CJ) (J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan