The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Gian Chand Mittal
High Court
27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Gian Chand Mittal
Date of order
27 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Gian Chand Mittal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No. 65 of 2006 (O&M )DATE OF DECISION : 27.01.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
_.. APPELLANT
Versus
Gian Chand Mittal
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present :Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate, forMr. T.K. Joshi, Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate, with|Mr. Parvesh K. Saini, Advocate,for the respondent.
OR OR
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.( Oral )
Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the
Department, states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 issued by theGovernment of India vide letter dated 10.12.2015, the appellant departmentdoes want to pursue this appeal.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )JUDGE
January 27, 2016ndj
( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU )JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue