Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridaba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Bhagwan Ram Trust, 526/16,Civil Lines, Gurgaon

High Court 02 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Bhagwan Ram Trust, 526/16,Civil Lines, Gurgaon
Date of order
02 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Bhagwan Ram Trust, 526/16,Civil Lines, Gurgaon, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of agreement between the parties, the appeal isallowed, order dated 15.10.2004 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Delhi Bench, Delhi is set aside and the order passed in appeal aswell as the assessment order, are restored.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH. ITA No.248 of 2005 Date of Decision: 02.07.2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ....Appellant Versus M/s Bhagwan Ram Trust, 526/16,Civil Lines, Gurgaon ....Respondent ITA No.257 of 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ....Appellant Versus Smt. Neelam Gupta, 526/16,Civil Lines, Gurgaon ....Respondent CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present:-Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocatefor the appellant. Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocateand Mr. Devinder Goel, Advocatefor the respondent. ***** RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) By way of this Order, we shall dispose of ITA No.248 of 2005 and ITA No.257 of 2005 as they involve adjudication of a similar questionof law. For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from Income Tax Appeal No.248 of 2005. The revenue challenges order dated 15.10.2004 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, Delhi. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the controversy inthe present case is squarely covered in favour of the revenue and againstthe respondent by judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.392 of 2005 titled as The Commissioner of Income Tax,Faridabad vs Sh. Kamal Gupta, decided on 20.01.2011. In view of agreement between the parties, the appeal isallowed, order dated 15.10.2004 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Delhi Bench, Delhi is set aside and the order passed in appeal aswell as the assessment order, are restored. (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE 02.07.2013 gurpreet (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan