The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri K.n. Aggarwal
High Court
02 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri K.n. Aggarwal
Date of order
02 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri K.n. Aggarwal, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.50 of 2015Date of decision: 02.02.2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
....Appellant
Versus
Shri K.N. Aggarwal
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Sr. Advocate, with
Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocate, for the respondent-assessee.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(ORAL)
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hasbeen filed against the order dated 28.04.2014 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T. (SS). A No.101/DEL/1998 for theblock period 01.04.1986 to 14.08.1996.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has receivedverbal instructions in terms of Circular No.24/2015 dated 31.12.2015 towithdraw the present appeal. A prayer was made that liberty be granted tothe appellant to move an application for revival of the appeal is somethingsurvives therein.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
February 02, 2017R.S.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue