Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hazariba...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hazaribagh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir, Bokaro

High Court 20 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hazaribagh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir, Bokaro
Date of order
20 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hazaribagh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir, Bokaro, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above reasons, no question of law is involved in these appeals, hence, these appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

----- Tax Appeal No. 19 of 2010With Tax Appeal No. 20 of 2010WithTax Appeal No. 21 of 2010WithTax Appeal No. 22 of 2010WithTax Appeal No. 23 of 2010 ----- The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hazaribagh ................Appellant VersusAdarsh Vidya Mandir, Bokaro............ Respondent----- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Roshan, AdvocateFor the Respondent: ----- Order No. 07Dated, 20th March, 2013 These Tax Appeals have been preferred by the Revenue to assail the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi as well as the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) whereby both the lower authorities held that the assessee is running educational institution and it is not earning profit. Revenue receipt, however exceeded and in view of the specific provisions under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) read with Rule 2BC(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the limit of such excess receipt if exceeds Rupees One Crore, then only the exemption is not allowed to such institution. However, in this case, for the assessment year 1999-2000 to 2003-2004 for all five years, receipt was maximum upto Rs.42,94,690=50 which is below the exemption limit of Rupees One Crore. In view of the above reasons, no question of law is involved in these appeals, hence, these appeals are dismissed. (Prakash Tatia, C. J.) (Jaya Roy , J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan