The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Sh. Shiv Kumar
High Court
03 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Sh. Shiv Kumar
Date of order
03 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Sh. Shiv Kumar, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J C.M.No.2312 CII of 2008 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days inrefiling the appeal is condoned.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M No.2312 CII of 2008 and I.T.A No. 87 of 2008
Date of decision : October 03, 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar
v.
Sh. Shiv Kumar,
...... Appellant.
..... Respondent.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
***
Present :Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant.
***
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
***
AJAY TEWARI, J
C.M.No.2312 CII of 2008
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 61 days inrefiling the appeal is condoned. C.M stands disposed of.ITA No.87 of 2008
The revenue has filed this appeal against the order dated12.1.2007, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench,proposing the following substantial questions of law :-
“ 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the learned ITAT is right in admitting and
I.T.A No. 87 of 2008 (O&M)
::2::
adjudicating the additional ground of appeal when therelevant issue was not raised by the assessee before theCIT (A) ?
2. Whether ITAT is right in adopting the mercantilesystem of accounting at the appellate stage by makingreliance on the order of the Apex Court, even though theassessee has voluntarily offered his income by adoptingcash system of accounting during the assessmentproceedings and that was assessed as such ?
Before us, counsel for the revenue has not pressed the secondquestion. With regard to the first question, counsel for the revenue hasfairly conceded that the appeal is squarely covered against the revenue bythe decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Thermal Power Co.Ltdv. Commissioner of Income-Tax, 229 ITR 383.
In this view of the matter, we decide question No.1 against therevenue. The appeal is dismissed.
( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE
October 03, 2008'kk'
( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.