Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I], Jalan...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I], Jalandhar v. M/S Zoloto Industries (Regd.), Jalandhar

High Court 02 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I], Jalandhar v. M/S Zoloto Industries (Regd.), Jalandhar
Date of order
02 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I], Jalandhar v. M/S Zoloto Industries (Regd.), Jalandhar, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned;Yes2.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH whe ITA No.13 of 2013 (O&M)Date of Decision: 03.10.2018whe The Commissioner of Income Tax-I], Jalandhar Versus ..... Appellant M/s Zoloto Industries (Regd.), Jalandhar ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTHONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Present:Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant. SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1)Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involvedin this case 1s|29,85,090/- and in view of the recent Circular No.3/2018dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, the tax effect being less than4-.lacs, he does not want to press this appeal on merits. (2)In view of the CBDT Circular, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellant, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal, if need be, in thechanged circumstances. The question of law is also Kept open. (SURYA KANT)JUDGE 03.10.2018 Bhumika (SUDIP AHLUWALIA)JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned;Yes2. Whether reportable:No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan