The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited
High Court
09 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited
Date of order
09 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2078 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur..Appellant.
Versus
Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 9TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that so far as question (a) and (b) is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limitedreported in [2008] 301 ITR 191.
2.So far as question (c) is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court on 30-06-2009 in the case of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakhar Karkhana Limited in Income Tax AppealNo.930 of 2008.
3.In this view of the matter, the appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue