The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited
High Court
06 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited
Date of order
06 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur v. Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2073 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Kolhapur..Appellant.
Versus
Manganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal.
2.The appeal is taken up for hearing at the request of learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that so far as the first question is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara
Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue