The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -I, Mumbai v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
High Court
23 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -I, Mumbai v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
23 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -I, Mumbai v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 849 of 2011.
The Commissioner of Income-tax -I, Mumbai... Appellant.
Versus
Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd ... Respondent.
Mr Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr S.N. Inamdar, Senior Counsel with Jitendra Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 23 December, 2011.
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the similar question raised by the Revenue in the case of CIT vs. Kisan Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No. 930/2008 has been dismissed on 30.6.2009. In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue