The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. M/S Umesh Marketing Ltd., Nagpur)With
High Court
28 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. M/S Umesh Marketing Ltd., Nagpur)With
Date of order
28 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. M/S Umesh Marketing Ltd., Nagpur)With, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2010
(The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Umesh Marketing Ltd., Nagpur)WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.67 OF 2009
(The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Dineshbhai C. Patel (HUF), Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant,Shri N.S. Bhattad, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 28th OCTOBER, 2010
Learned Counsel for both the sides agree that the questions raised in these two appeals are similar to the questions raised in Income Tax Appeal No.84/2010, which is dismissed by us today. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue