Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Nash...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Nashik v. Bedmutha Wire Company Limited

High Court 20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Nashik v. Bedmutha Wire Company Limited
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Nashik v. Bedmutha Wire Company Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.The question of law as framed by the Revenue, which reads thus : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made in by the Assessing Officer of Rs.61,17,308/- being excise duty not included in Closing Stock by the Asses...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.470 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - I, Nashik..Appellant. Versus Bedmutha Wire Company Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.S.N. Inamdar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 20[th] July, 2011. 1.The question of law as framed by the Revenue, which reads thus : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made in by the Assessing Officer of Rs.61,17,308/- being excise duty not included in Closing Stock by the Assessee as required under Section 145A of the Income-tax Act? 2.Admittedly, the manufactured goods have not been cleared from the factory gate. In such a case, question of including the excise duty element in the valuation of the closing stock does not arise. No fault can be found with the order of the Tribunal in holding that the excise duty element is not includible in the valuation of the closing stock. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan