The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Nashik v. Ita
High Court
26 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Nashik v. Ita
Date of order
26 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -I, Nashik v. Ita, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
______________________________________________________
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.23 OF 2015
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -I, NASHIKVERSUS
Smt. Shilpa Suhas Wani (Kele)
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sharma Alok M. AGP for Respondents: ...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: FEBRUARY 26, 2016
…
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant has placed on record a communication dated 18.12.2015 received from the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Judicial), Pune. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification purpose.
2The learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that, since a policy decision has been taken by the Income Tax Department, that appeal shall not be filed in the High Court in the cases having monetary stakes below Rs.20,00,000/- and since the said decision has been made applicable
kadam/
retrospectively, the appellant shall be permitted to withdraw the present appeal by reserving their rights to agitate the legal issues and objections raised in the present appeal in appropriate cases.
3In view of the submissions so made, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal with liberty as prayed for. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(P.R. BORA, J)
(S.S. SHINDE, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.