Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Paota...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Paota C Road, Jodhpur v. Hari Singh

High Court 01 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Paota C Road, Jodhpur v. Hari Singh
Date of order
01 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Paota C Road, Jodhpur v. Hari Singh, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly,this petition for writ too is dismissed in terms of the judgmentgiven in the case of Union of India & Ors.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3608 / 2014 The Union of India through Secretary to Government of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Paota C Road, Jodhpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Hari Singh S/o. Sh. Jai Singh, by caste Rajput, aged about 46 years, R/o. Palanpur House Colony, Abhishek Palace, Mount Abu. 2. Yashwant Rawal S/o. Shri Bhanwar Lal Ji, by caste Rawal, aged about 26 years, R/o. Village Sareshwar Ji, Post Mandwa, District Sirohi. Applicants are at present employed as Casual Labour (Chokidar & Class IV) in the Mount Abu Office under Control of respondent. 3. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Jodhpur. ----Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KK Bissa For Respondent(s) : -- _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. MOOLCHANDANI Order 01/03/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he hasalready removed the defects pointed out by office. He has also brought into our notice that the issue involved in this petition forwrit is no more res intergra in light of judgment dated 19.3.2015passed by this Court in batch of writ petitions led by D.B. CivilWrit Petition No.1024/2011 (Union of India & Ors. Vs. JeevanSingh Gehlot & Ors.). Having considered facts of the case, we are satisfied that thiscase is squarely covered by the judgment aforesaid. Accordingly,this petition for writ too is dismissed in terms of the judgmentgiven in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Jeevan Singh Gehlot& Ors. (supra). (G.R. MOOLCHANDANI)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Sanjay
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan